Space Fighter<watermarked><updated second="" space="" craft="" model=""></updated></watermarked>

[DMF]

image bk up. any improvement sugestions?

[Fyr]

Your biggest issue is one that is really more of a common misconception. Flames do not splay outward upon leaving the confines of the thruster.

See: [http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a15/ap15-S71-41810HR.jpg](http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a15/ap15-S71-41810HR.jpg)

Also: [http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ben-krasnow-diy-rocket-engine-640x353.jpg](http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ben-krasnow-diy-rocket-engine-640x353.jpg)

The following is a good illustration on what a proper burn looks like:


[DMF]

?? think the back is ok, but ill look into wat your saying.(most of the burns looked that way except first and last. ) any improvements to the ship its self?

[JeffSventora]

> Jeff this isnt a debate topic i accept your idea. but it really has no bearing on the art of it. so unless you has an idea on improving it art aspect of it then please share. i wont be making a debate on anything to off track the topic.  but this wont be in a game its just so i do somethin. 
>
> Updated Thurst.

This is simply not a debate. I am not an artist, I am a programmer. This seems to be some kind of art asset for a game right? As a programmer I'm giving you insight on how you can improve efficiency. I doubt you would go through all of the trouble of copyrighting/watermarking this if you weren't going to use it in some form of project or at least someone else use it. Your art is good but I would never use it and that's why I'm giving you some tips. Accept advice if you want, but that's what you're going to get in this section.

[DMF]

ik and mostly they wont get used. as from a coders point a view i can understand since a ship can be coded to move and seprate animation graphics for the thrust boost. but not everyone can program dats point of view this ship is based on. now ill point to the upper right side. single lone ship no fire just a base hmmmm i wonder y i did this??? i had planed to have an exta one there in case of that and backed up the orignal boost thrust. also im working on ship fighter #2\. Yawns :/

but thanks for saying its good.  and i hope you understand my point of the sheet since not everyone can program or get help to.

[Dark Crusade]

> first ill be nice to ya. captian bald man is awesome. next i said my image couldnt be used

Just a tip, I noticed you watermarked your spaceships and said it's not for use. Under the creative commons lisence, anyone can share, edit, or use your work as long as they don't make money. Which means for 99.99% of the people on this forum, they can freely use and edit it.

[cheatking]

> Just a tip, I noticed you watermarked your spaceships and said it's not for use. Under the creative commons lisence, anyone can share, edit, or use your work as long as they don't make money. Which means for 99.99% of the people on this forum, they can freely use **and edit it.**

You sure? I mean he does have no derivative works in there.

[Dark Crusade]

> You sure? I mean he does have no derivative works in there.

Oh, your correct. His lisencing reveals that people can use and distribute his work, but not edit it. Which still nonetheless defeats the purpose of his watermark.

Regardless, don't take copyright too seriously until your professional or commercial. Even if someone was to edit your crummy spaceship, you'd never go to the effort, or be able to take legal action. The minimum requirement for copyright or trademark infringement is to prive that there was at least $1000 in statutory damages to your business.

[DMF]

can use?> well in understanding i permit 0 use as i can state . umm if its non editable then you look very silly using water marked image. next if you think its crummy dont and dont got contructive useful conmments on immproving dont post? lastly look up Marshy Dearest said stop on water mark crap… seriously just comment on just the ship we are not in preschool we all can read... btw ship 2 out and thrusting will probly change.

UPDATE:ship # 2: combat type.

@ MrSean: thanks for pointing this out to him.

WaterMark+ no editing= useless.

editing a image even im im not a company b/c of current problems in usa (example mega upload to a regualar person is just as bad.> now im done talking about water marks and copyrights crap if you need more info Read it will explain < [http://creativecommo…s/by-nc-nd/3.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) >. Only comment on the ships…. sadly why do i even try it only hand full even gave helpful comments. ...

Real improving comment only welcomed. this isnt a debate section or topic.

Cookies make you smile!<3

[Scott]

**Attribution** — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

**Noncommercial** — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.

**No Derivative Works** — You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.

Sweet I'm using this in my noncommercial space game, thanks for the contribution!

[DMF]

sigh ur really are dumb:

**You are free:**

* **to Share** — to copy, distribute and transmit the work

only way around such is with my permission which isnt given.

i set it with out ability to allow use. now scott if you use it there will be legal issue and your making it as such plus fact you already commited the no editing to start with. share doesnt mean you can use it.

[Agoraphobic]

This topic has degraded far enough from almost everyone involved. There is nothing constructive going on now, it has degraded to everyone baiting each other, then few people demanding punishment, even though they're equally guilty of baiting.

Locking this now, until people involved can cool off and learn to stop baiting each other.