Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Pryex

Members
  • Posts

    2249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Pryex

  1. > Fact: DNA replication has a built-in error checking method, and any attempt made by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.

    You sir are an idiot!

    That error checking system only deletes things that are not usefull!
    And since half of each parents genes are passed on, each spawn would be different, with different changed DNA, so if as you claim, the DNA deletes anything that was attempted to change, we would all be exactly the same.

    As for your eye argument, Darwin explained the holes in your theory, perhaps if you googled that, you would see that you have things in the wrong order.

    1\. a cluster of light sensative cells9only detects life)
    2\. these cells develop a pit around them, so as to catch more light(some cells also vary, through mutations, which the DNA does not see as an error! And become sensative to different wavelenghts)
    3\. the pit developes a protective casing(can you guess what comes next??)
    4\. inside of this "bubble" of cells, a lense forms, so that light can be focused to form shapes etc

    And there you have, an eye, that would not be deleted because each part of it is beneficial to the species survival.

    All in 4 simpe steps.

    P.S: you surely know that each cell is connected to nerves etc that eventually link to the brain. same for the eye, it began as a few nerve cells, but then when the eye grew bigger, so did the nerve needed to connect it!

    You must also remember that it is a minority of people still do not believe ion evolution, because of your "facts"…
  2. Agrophobia is a serious problem, this may sound silly, but why not practise being near people loke this:

    Get a mobile that can have video calls, if you get used to peoples faces(in general), then you may b able to go outised and speak to people in person.

    However the outside problem occurs, umm, I'm only 14 but I'll do some research and if you would like my help please feel free to PM me.
  3. I believe somebody said that the exo skeleton could be rock depending on the environment.

    What you just described was a Trilobyte. they excreted minerals which formed a shell of rock covering their entire bodies, and those complex eyes were not complex, they were a cluster of light sensative cells, encased in crystaline structures.
  4. @Ace:

    > No matter what you say, or what I read, I will never believe in Nibiru unless I get news (with photos) from a trustable source that it actually does exist.
    >
    > I mean, Nasa have already detected planets lightyears away, why wouldn't they see this Nibiru? BECAUSE IT'S NOT THERE. IT DOESN'T EXIST. (srry for the caps, just trying to stress this)

    Search Nibiru on NASA,nothing will come up, except for a warning thatthe article does not exist and your internet will be cancelled should you attempt the search again.

    Now you tell me it doesn't exist.
  5. @AdrianC:

    > That just shows that the bible is messed up.
    >
    > Doesn't it also say "witches" should be put to death? Salem witch hunts anybody?

    Again an old thing, but my RE teacher(a christian) says that those rules were creted while the people were in the desert, and to prevent disease being spread, so as to ensure that the Isrealites survived.

    So technically, the bible says it's fine to be gay.
  6. When I mention Nibiru, I do not mean planet X, nor does Sitchin,that was a warped internet thing when somebody heard his theory of creation, which I shall now explain.

    Tiamat, was originally the third planet from the sun, but Tiamat was destroyed, a planet the sdize of Jupiter passed by it, it was called Nibiru. At this time Nibiru was still a ball of molten rock, originally orbiting the sun at a larger orbit, but the combined gravity of the planets pulled it dangerously close, and so, nibiru's satalites collided with tiamat. This created the earth, the moon and some fragments went on to create the asteroid belt between mars and jupiter. earth however was on the same orbit as Tiamat, and another collision from the secind of nibiru's satalites knocked earth into it's current orbit.

    nibiru, if real has  3600 year orbi around our sun(apsa), and it is also the homeworld of the Anunnaki, whom the babylonians and the sumerians hailed as Gods, and earths creators.

    Like i said, it's a theory, one which the more I read, the more I accept it, as, if you get the book and read on, it also explains the flood.

    so please I recommend it, and I may even start a topic on it.
  7. My physics teacher told me, and another think I remembered.

    scientists don't even think that we originated from earth anymore, they believe that what contained our oldests ancestors came from a comet, which supports the whole Sitchin theory of Nibiru, the Anunnaki and Tiamat, you really need to google this book:

    the 12th planet, it's incredibly interesting the theorys, and even though i'm athiest, some of the creation things in, I can honerstly say I believe.
  8. @AdrianC:

    > Organisms can't be made of rock or metals, because, keyword, those aren't organic.
    >
    > Life can only be carbon or silicone based. Carbon is the most likely element, because its more stable (I think?).

    That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard! the universe is 15billion light years squared. to think that the only elements that exist anywhere are those found on earth isd proposterous.

    Elements on other planets could well be very different to elements on earth and they could createb life, meaning that technically somewhere out there, you could get creatures made out of what we percieve to be "rock".

    heck silicon based life could also lead to real life transformers out there aswell.

    Also water has been discovered elsewhere in the universe, they did actually find a planet where the entire surface of it was just that:water.
×
×
  • Create New...