Ghoul Posted September 25, 2017 Author Share Posted September 25, 2017 Is it poor game design to have maps with varying max sizes? For example, having a "tutorial" area that is 20x20, but "overworld" maps generally being larger. Not sure if this would almost ruin the feeling of the game due to this inconsistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohenjo Daro Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 I'm played a few games that have different map sizes, and it can work well if you use the warp attribute instead of the map's default teleport when you walk into the side. The warp attribute will make it feel more consistent but take more time to implement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xlithan Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 This is how old mapping used to be done to make it look seamless. Make the map size fairly large and then put the warp attributes about 5 squares in. It's not really worth it. I believe Konfuze or Elysium used to have genuine seamless mapping but it was incredibly laggy.As for the OP's question. No it's not really bad practice to have different map sizes. And you CAN make the world consistent by doing something like this:![Map Consistency](https://i.imgur.com/JZG5LKJ.png) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xlithan Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Forgot to mention downside of this is you can only have 1 map to each side of a map. You'd have to use warp attributes for say, Map 3 to Map 2 and Map 4. But your world map will be consistent with this method. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelR Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 I have a doubt.What disadvantages are there when making large maps, ie from 50x50 to 100x100? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohenjo Daro Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 @angelr Speed and stability. A friend of mine made a 200x200 map (EO 2 based engine) and it was extremely slow to move around, then he added trees and the map would crash the server when opened.Also, smaller maps means the packets sent from server to client are smaller (using less bandwidth [I think that's the right term?]) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelR Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 @mohenjo-daro Oh okay, I understand. Thank you very much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xlithan Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 To be honest, you don't really benefit much from having large maps, besides being able to talk to other players on the same map, but who wants to talk to other players when you're grinding? Not me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunku Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 Bigger maps are better for 3D games. I personally prefer medium sized maps with intricate details. But a combination of larger -> medium -> small maps can work amazingly as long as you connect them in a smart/efficient way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xlithan Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 You'll probably find that large 3D games don't always use large maps, they're just seamless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now